La femme meurt en juillet, Mélanie Béliveau
Éditions
Mains Libres, 2022

Having had the good fortune of hearing
Mélanie Béliveau read several times from her second collection, La femme meurt en juillet (The Woman Dies in July), I wanted to
spend more time with the collection as a whole. Béliveau made herself
vulnerable by writing about having breast cancer and being treated for it, and
presented her vulnerability both as a person and as a physician who was forced
to rely on others. As a listener, not yet a reader, I struggled not to hold
back, not to hold her voice and the poems at a safe distance – I struggled not
to engage in voyeurism. By sitting in a room, quietly, and listening, by
sitting with her, by attempting to carry the moment and the months and life it
held, I hoped I would be able to welcome these poems. Immediately, I wanted to
read the poems by myself, in a different state of vulnerability. Not exposed to
others’ gaze and view, not open to the destruction a response can wreak.
Knowing that I wouldn’t fully hear or read the poems, I thought I could at
least gain something if I sat with nothing but the words and their
accumulation, until I could let them create an impression within me, until I
could let the collection shift something in me, as the excerpts did. Certainly
any book of poetry ought to do this, at least to some extent.
Instead of focusing on cancer, Béliveau
writes about her body, her capacity to see it, her relation to it, to herself,
to life. She has explained in many interviews that she did not write about
cancer, or even about the possibility of death, but about the transformation
they brought to her life.
As the site of cancer, and as the object
of removal through mastectomy, her breasts take on a variety of meanings.
First, literal: “I see death / my breast always on me / I’d like for it to
be elsewhere” (je vois la mort / mon
sein tout le temps sur moi / je voudrais qu’il soit ailleurs, 19). Also sore, or simply nude.
And then they are qualified as more or less unreal: a ghost breast; inflatable
replicas; one an elite sniper menacing the other; unknown; car rims; RoboCop;
vacant; expropriated – and felt up, subject to wandering hands.
The allusions to sex are far from limited
to mentions of the breast – indeed, the poems include, but do not describe,
unsexy sex, sex where anger and fatigue hover, where a desperate search for
life dominates. There’s a desire to be desired, one that is met but unfulfilled
at the same time. Sometimes desire is brutally negated:
I passed through
the stained glass of your warm neck in
bloom
powdered my desire
everywhere
shattered my
orgasms, pluralized
you struck your
eyes into mine
I set the
operating table
j’ai traversé le
vitrail de ta nuque chaude fleurie
poudroyé mon désir
partout
fracassé mes
orgasmes au pluriel
tu t’es acharné
sur mes yeux
j’ai mis la table
d’opération (20)
In this poem, we see the percussive effect
of the writing, which at once carries anger and holds it back; we see the
immense metaphors that allude to all that is unreachable, unattainable. The
violence rises from passing through, to powdering or dusting, shattering (but
say: fra-ca-sser, feel how hard it feels in your mouth), and finally striking
(but think: s’acharner, striking over
and over, getting into the flesh, chair). This crescendo takes what might
be lovely moment of eyes locking into eyes during sex into a refusal to look at
anything but the eyes: a moment of shared desperation and impossible proximity.
La femme meurt en juillet is full of
moments like this, full of the tragedy of uncertain transformations and
(self-)destruction (and here I use tragedy in the strong sense of a force which
cannot be controlled and dooms those who suffer from its action, not something
that is merely incredibly sad). A few pages further, the hope of abandon
through sex meets the reality of pain. Without pointing to a divide in the
couple, Béliveau shows the conflict between sexual desire and the need for
comfort and a different kind of intimacy, both within herself and between her
and her partner: “love or sex / the sign can’t be read from here” (amour ou
sexe / la pancarte n’est pas lisible d’ici, 84).
A deepening anger underlies most of the
poems, beginning with memories of childhood and adolescence which rather than
being moments of innocence, have become moments of not-yet knowing. Béliveau
can no longer access these memories without going through the shock she is
still experiencing, and which has displaced what she might have learned since
her youth:
in my pocket a
shard of broken glass
fixes
everythings at fifteen years old
at forty you
receive a blow to the face
you no longer know
anything
and golden
cemeteries await us
dans ma poche un
bout de verre brisé
ça règle tout à quinze ans
à quarante on
reçoit un coup au visage
on ne connaît plus
rien
et les cimetières
dorés nous attendent (14)
Yet there are limits to this anger. The
lack of titles and strong statements, together with the short lines that make
up poems that are themselves relatively brief, all point to fatigue. Expressing
anger then appears as a choice, as is letting exhaustion orient her response.
In the “Three months post-op” section, anger seems to dominate: “the world
could go right to hell” (le monde pourrait aller chier comme il faut, 68); “I
lost my empathy / at the corner of King street and 13th avenue” (j’ai perdu mon
empathie / au coin de la rue King et de la 13e avenue, 69). But anger is never
the sole emotion: this seventh section ends with fear and the feeling that
something remains hidden – and Béliveau struggles with the scarves she must
wear and which appear in a sequence of poems as an obstructing extension of her
being.
The titles of the last two sections play
on the meanings of leave – to take leave of cancer, to be on leave from work.
The emptiness of the post-cancer period is surrounded, cushioned, by the
realization that life remains possible, one which Béliveau makes less and less
futile efforts to seize. She learns to see herself anew through someone else’s
eyes – the one who loves her, who continues to desire her, but also her
“amazon,” another person who underwent a double mastectomy but chose to go
without implants.
Together they learn to see themselves
through one another: “our seams we showed / one another and me” (on s’est
montré nos coutures / l’une et l’autre et moi, 70); “our scars we unveiled /
told a story” (on s’est dévoilé nos cicatrices / raconté une histoire, 71).
Only once the transformation is complete can Béliveau see herself without
needing someone else’s gaze as mediation:
I was able to look
at myself without your eyes
a hundred and ten
bandages a hundred drains
before me a
creature that was not being born
this time it will have taken more than forceps
curled up clammy
trembling
she was
strong yelled at passersby
j’ai été capable
de me regarder sans tes yeux
cent dix
pansements cent drains
devant moi une
créature qui ne naissait pas
cette fois ça aura pris plus que des forceps
recroquevillée
moite tremblante
elle était
forte criait aux passants (99)
Comparisons of herself to a scavenger give
way to metaphors of her and her partner as “benevolant predators / friends to
the great cold / each at their window
against absence / drawing great things / captive birds” (de
bienveillants prédateurs / amis des grands froids / chacun à sa fenêtre contre l’absence / dessinant de grandes
choses / oiseaux captifs, 84). In the very last section, analogical thinking
seems less necessary, as Béliveau writes more directly about clear results from
follow-up appointments and a new proximity to her partner. Pain remains, even
though “nothing can prevent the we any longer” (plus rien ne peut empêcher le
nous, 103).
Writing a book, of course, allows for
another view altogether, far from those of those who people her life. Coming
Béliveau, who now sees herself as a poet who practises medicine, a mention of
the Québécoise poet Marie Uguay, despite its sobriety, marks the shadow that
disease and death cast upon poetry. Uguay’s work remains on the whole to be
translated (but see three poems in periodicities and the selected
poems published by Guernica), but she is known among readers of poetry in
Québec to have died of cancer at the age of 26, at the beginning of an already
fruitful life of writing – while Béliveau, not that far later in life, was
being treated for cancer around the time when she published what was only her
first collection.
In spite of this explicit comparison,
Béliveau only addresses the act of writing in her poems at the very end, as a
way to acknowledge what she does to those she loves as she emerges from the
anger, fear, and fatigue of the treatment. Writing seems to come after the
fact, not as document but as yet another movement through the transformation, a
way to complete it, to make herself visible not only to those she trusts, to
herself, but to the world – irrevocably putting herself into the world. “I must
write my being brought into the world” she concludes, “red like July” (je dois
écrire ma mise au monde / rouge comme juillet, 105). These last words echo the
line that gives the collection its title where she becomes a third person to
herself. Here, like in the rest of the collection, she alternates between the
direct and obvious, and the highly abstract and metaphorical. But in the
writing, as opposed to the experience of cancer and the transformations it
initiates, nothing is cloaked.

Jérôme Melançon
writes and teaches and writes and lives in oskana kâ-asastêki / Regina, SK. His
most recent chapbook is with above/ground press, Tomorrow’s Going to Be Bright (2022, after 2020’s Coup), and his most recent poetry
collection is En d’sous d’la langue
(Prise de parole, 2021). He has also published two books of poetry with
Éditions des Plaines, De perdre tes pas
(2011) and Quelques pas quelque part
(2016), as well as one book of philosophy, La
politique dans l’adversité (Metispresses, 2018). He has edited books and
journal issues, and keeps publishing academic articles that have nothing to do
with any of this. He’s on Twitter mostly, and sometimes on Instagram, both at
@lethejerome.