Showing posts with label Carl Watts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carl Watts. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 4, 2021

Carl Watts : Permanent Carnival Time, by Colin Smith

Permanent Carnival Time, Colin Smith
ARP Books, 2021

 

 


 

The title of Colin Smith’s new book might refer to Mikhail Bakhtin’s sense of the carnival as the use of humour and chaos to subvert dominant culture or taste. Either way, the addition of “permanent” to the term renders this state absurd by eliminating the very spontaneity that would define it. And indeed, the deadened landscape of consumer preferences and political positions one finds in Permanent Carnival Time depicts exactly this burned-out non-energy, as it defines both the world around us as well as whatever ability we might have to comment on it in any meaningful way.

The Kootenay School of Writing was established following the closure of the David Thompson University Centre; it has existed since then as a loosely defined series of temporary affiliations. Smiths work is often considered part of this evolving body of poetry, which seized on Language writing’s challenge to the lyric voice and often engages with the gap between the totality of the market and the speaking subject’s pretense to agency. It’s a convincing fusion of poetics and politics, but I’ve sometimes had difficulty grasping exactly what kind of there is there. The poems themselves range from familiar Language approaches and topics to free-ish verse that, however studded with Mad Libs, still signifies relatively straightforwardly. Critical writing on the poetry’s singular radicalism, meanwhile, sometimes seems to me to come up short. These readings often reach into the realm of the subjective: it’s not only disjunctive, but really, really disjunctive; it not only chooses words carefully, but registers the implications of those choices; it’s not just radical, but actually, in-real-life radical.

Permanent Carnival Time both encapsulates the quiddity of the KSW and stares directly into this nebulous indefinability. There’s an old-school working-class politics here, even if it’s subject to linguistic disruption. “Necessities for the Whole Hog,” for example, nudges analogy and sloganeering just past meaning when it says that “Governments and citizens have the same / thing in common as landlords and tenants / and bosses and workers / -- nothing” (8). It undermines sweeping political pronouncements, seizing instead on postmodernist concerns with nuance and incomparability. At the same time, the poems read like the work of a veteran mining his preferred vein, sheltered from subsequent trends that would mark the writing of a younger poet while maintaining a kind of disoriented irreverence. A few pages later, the lines

                      Imagine what a little
       
              Guaranteed Annual Income could do.

                

                      Herbal tea
                     
(plenitude). (14)

throw snarky, consumerist critique together with a practical, even populist economic activism. Both sentiments seem somewhat removed from the types of activism usually explored in the literary arts, but they’re by no means problematizing the poetic speaker beyond recognition.

This dual commitment to vocalization and screw-around-with-it attitude exposes the wound-up, off-kilter core of KSW poetics, if a single such thing could be said to exist. Jason Wiens, in an astute 2017 article in Canadian Literature, throws some light on this dynamic. Wiens reads two versions of “Indolent Corollaries,” from Smith’s Multiple Poses (1997), writing that each engages with ubiquitous consumerism by employing discontinuity, defamiliarization, and disruption, and that while Smith’s iteration of KSW poetics may seem more “confessional,” it “remains a documentation of an ephemeral structure of feeling in our long neoliberal moment, rather than a confessional narrative” (81). Wiens’s is a careful reading, but this aspect of it might make one wonder what, exactly, separates a poem that is “a documentation of an ephemeral structure of feeling in our long neoliberal moment” from a magpie lyric poem expressing a set of feelings about our long neoliberal moment.

Perhaps the difference lies in how much of a KSW adherent one is. At any rate, the poems in Permanent Carnival Time make it somewhat more difficult to disentangle the two. Unlike some of Smith’s past work, his new book showcases an unfashionable, unfashionably grounded sense of self that smooths out the above engagement with what it even means to hold forth using the trope of the quotidian unfamiliarities of old age. “Corner Talk” twists up the vagaries of taste and consumer choice using cloying, complaining voices: “‘If their crap bread is almost the same price as / their artisanal stuff, we should get the latter’ / ‘Why don’t we stop buying bread?’” (46). The politicians, novels, and films that crop up throughout make for a mundane swath of contemporary culture. At a time when the conflation of work, leisure, and competitive consumption is just everyday life, and the idea of blending high and low culture is itself a middlebrow cliché, all these layers exist in Smith’s uncertain half-lyric in a way that recalls a time when they might have been more distinct.

There are expected Language touchstones, like swaths of medical terminology (in “Essaying Pain”) and the poems’ references to named artistic milieux (“Winnipeg’s public art is far less suckhole / than that of many other places. When Marbles on Portage / by Erica Swendrowski went out on Tuesday 31 July 2012…” [14]). But the voice at times surprises in spite of its aesthetic alignment, offering a reflective and self-deprecating picture of itself at a distance from that voice’s formation, like when “Necessities for the Whole Hog” reflects,

                     After the long throb of all my years -- 62 -- my cultural and
                    
political alliances are still somehow attached to Asian workers
                    
-- my long-ago and home-like Vancouver spell -- even though

                    
I grew up in a Southern Ontario as white as any idiot’s idea of
                    
Christianity, and stand now -- well bent over with pain -- on

                    
the Prairies. (28)

This kind of awkwardness and adulterated sincerity appears regularly, even in “Essaying Pain”:

                     “Feeling eternal, all this / pain is an illusion.” I would challenge
                    
Reverend Maynard to drop in at my place -- I’d serve us tea and
                    
biscuits -- and haggle over this concept, but I can hear darn

                    
well from other Tool songs that he knows acutely what pain is. (35)

It’s these clever twists in content that do the work as much as any formal features, let alone any commitment to an identifiable poetics. Perhaps the KSW gave us a ragged, sometimes compelling series of moments in which these strains intertwined into something principled and distinct. But Permanent Carnival Time shows whatever remains of that tradition dissolving further into the always-assimilating hybrid poetics of the present.

 

 

 

Carl Watts holds a PhD in English from Queen’s University and currently teaches at Huazhong University of Science and Technology. His articles, book reviews, and poems have appeared in various Canadian and American journals. He has published two poetry chapbooks, Reissue (Frog Hollow, 2016) and Originals (Anstruther, 2020), as well as a short monograph, Oblique Identity: Form and Whiteness in Recent Canadian Poetry (Frog Hollow, 2019).

Saturday, January 2, 2021

Carl Watts : Deportment: The Poetry of Alice Burdick, selected with an introduction by Alessandro Porco

Deportment: The Poetry of Alice Burdick, selected with an introduction by Alessandro Porco
Laurier Poetry Series, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2018

 

 

 

Despite (because of?) its being sharp and stylized yet without many of the alienating or non-referential qualities that often characterize writing that is designated as experimental, Alice Burdick’s poetry hasn’t gotten quite the critical attention one might expect. Accordingly, her range of small-press publications seems like a logical candidate for a selected or some other kind of reintroduction. And, given the brevity of many of her poems as well as the many limited-run pamphlets and chapbooks she’s put out, the Laurier Poetry Series—the titles of which usually run well under a hundred pages—seems like a good fit.

Deportment: The Poetry of Alice Burdick, selected and introduced by Alessandro Porco, succeeds in providing the kind of showcase that might remedy this situation. But, in proposing a logically organized outline of her work, it also sustains the sense that Burdick’s output is somehow too unshapely to be made sense of. The poems pulse in shifting permutations of a few recognizable styles even as they’re couched in a series of releases out of which Porco, in his rigorous and informative introduction, constructs a neat two-part periodization. Burdick’s early small-press period, according to Porco, gives way to her run of perfect-bound books, with this progression roughly analogous to Burdick’s early life in Toronto and subsequent relocation to Nova Scotia.

Porco’s cataloguing of Burdick’s early micropress poetry—that written between 1989 and 2001—masterfully adds illumination (if not outright interpretation) to this descriptive function. Describing this run as showcasing the work of “an irritable satirist and an eccentric elegist” (xii), Porco selects examples from small pamphlet and chapbook editions as well as an unpublished manuscript that shares a title with the present volume. Voice of Interpreter (1991) stands out among these early offerings, its swaths of prose seeming like they’re arguing with themselves even as they exude a cool self-assuredness:

                     I’ll not be Queen of the nodding men. My game isn’t their game. Their game is                        full of cologne bottles and runny shit. Their game is golf gone up the hill and right                up the fucking tree. Not even close to the sun. If I’m wrong about this, well let                         me be wrong about this. The nodding men never notice dissent. (4)

Burdick’s run of small-press books, described in the introduction as more accessible in terms of both content and tone, is represented by sets of between four and six poems from Simple Master (2002), Flutter (2008), Holler (2012), and Book of Short Sentences (2016). And it’s true that, by the time of the latter volume’s “Travelling poem—Pittsburgh,” one finds the sly, combative notes smoothed out into the sonically resonant formalism of lines like

                     Flight or flight.
                    
Slow rise over the cloudbank,
                    
orange sink of sun which place

                    
places the location
                    
in reference to distance. (46)

But it’s also a blurry evolution that can be glimpsed only in an approximate sense. Any conception of a shift toward longer, more descriptive, or less syntactically fragmented forms has to account for poems like “Remembrance Day, 2011,” the final selection from Holler, which ends with the quippy, Steinian lines “We want there to be a reason / we can like. We want the dead we know / to count, as we don’t count the dead we don’t” (43).

Another blurred set of distinctions becomes evident if one regularly flips back to the table of contents to determine from which publication a poem is drawn. If one doesn’t do so, it’s often difficult to tell where a new publication starts. For instance, Porco takes three poems from Signs Like This (1994), each one similarly short and mockingly aphoristic. (“Space Program” reads, in its entirety, “With the right crutch / at the right time, / you too can insert / your fingers into science / and come up with Answers!” [6].) The first of three poems from the next publication, Fun Venue (1994), looks pretty much the same (and is found on the same page as “Space Program”), but the next two are noticeably longer, with “Tempo Rapture” in particular (“Or a dream which turned into / a real thing. As the birds / on the roof eat challah crumbs / and yell to gather on a thin/thick / telephone wire” [8]) having almost as much in common with the selections from Book of Short Sentences as with the earlier poems. Checking up on these details makes the act of dividing Burdick’s work into clusters of poems from the same source seem almost arbitrary; the poems themselves reveal several styles repeating and augmenting rather than a progression from one thing to another.

It’s a funny, but also productive, way of quantifying Burdick’s output. The order it tries to impose at once obscures and somehow makes comprehensible other odds and ends that don’t appear in the table of contents. 2016’s Chore Choir, with Kingston’s Puddles of Sky Press, for instance, is a pocket-sized, two-page poetic-prose offering that seems like a more clipped and yet more irreverent iteration of the poetics of Holler’s “Mahone Bay rhapsody.” Pleasure Bristles, a chapbook coauthored with Gary Barwin and published by above/ground in the same year as Deportment, disperses Burdick’s tactics further, raising questions about Porco’s conception of a gradual move toward accessibility while also justifying the editor’s selections by further permuting Burdick’s recognizable forms and splicing them Barwin’s.

Burdick’s afterword concludes Deportment with a similar sense of defamiliarized familiarity. It’s disorienting in that she begins abruptly with a vivid description of her earliest memories in a downtown Toronto home that “was filled with language”: “It was audible, in the voices of adults speaking, organizing, laughing, and fighting in our communal home” (55). The backstory at once fills in the blanks among the coolly murmurous mass of the poems and yet somehow exists on a continuum with them. It also, in a fittingly logical and yet paradoxical way, does justice to Porco’s framing of her work as much as it challenges his two-part distinction. Burdick’s here describes her different writing habits after giving birth—her “writing in a very disciplined way after having kids, differently from before kids, because my windows of time became very small” (59). This transition to a “strangely irregular but focused” way of writing seems, at least here, in Burdick’s gently disorienting explanation, like it’s at least as important a turning point in her work as her moves from Toronto and from the micropresses. Is it visible in the poetry? Yes and no; but, after all, we want to count the poems we like, as we don’t count the poems we don’t.

 

 

 

Carl Watts holds a PhD in English from Queen’s University and currently teaches at Huazhong University of Science and Technology. His articles, book reviews, and poems have appeared in various Canadian and American journals. He has published two poetry chapbooks, Reissue (Frog Hollow, 2016) and Originals (Anstruther, 2020), as well as a short monograph, Oblique Identity: Form and Whiteness in Recent Canadian Poetry (Frog Hollow, 2019).

most popular posts