Friday, December 5, 2025

Ben Berman Ghan : Is He Hungry?

 

-       After Nour Mobarak

 

We wipe away
          The
Delicate [murmur]ations
Clinging to skins and low
Hanging sleeves that force
them into the long
                                    DRIP-DRIP-DRIP-DRIP
Journey of
          Worms
And reds. 

                     But the click
And the tick and the
          Hum
Of lovely      lucid anger finds
A way back up to make the
                               DRIP-DRIP-DRIP
Pages out of anklets and thigh
And hip and—          

          Listen

Very close. You can hear
Them past the midnight
Mass and
Massacre: the steady rhythm
Of a
                               DRIP-DRIP
And    question
Singing and ringing
All around our ear 

Are we hungry?
       [I]
No. 

I am dead.
[we are]
[it is] 

          Going along and on into great mouths
In a steady
                               DRIP

 

 

 

 

Ben Berman Ghan is the author of The Years Shall Run Like Rabbits (Buckrider Books 2024), as well as Behold the Dead (Anstruther Press 2025), Visitation Seeds (845 Press 2020), and What We See in the Smoke (Crowsnest books 2019) His second collection of fiction, The Library Cosmic, is forthcoming with Buckrider Books for spring 2026. His prose, poetry, and criticism have previously been published in Clarkesworld Magazine, Strange Horizons, The Ex-Puritan, and The Ancillary Review of Books, and has been reprinted in such anthologies as Year’s Best Canadian Fantasy and Science Fiction. His work has won the Foreword INDIES Award for Science Fiction, and longlisted for the Sunburst Award for Excellence in Canadian Literature of the Fantastic, Ben is a PhD Candidate in English and creative writing at the University of Calgary, where he lives with his partner and two cats. Find him at inkstainedwreck.ca

Thursday, December 4, 2025

Chris Johnson : “I’m so fuckin self conscious I doubt the motives for shitting”: on being a writer-in-residence at the Al & Eurithe Purdy A-frame in late Fall 2025

 

 

 

 

 

I watched a National Film Board documentary about P.K. Page’s life and literary career while I was the writer-in-residence at the Al & Eurithe Purdy A-frame. I was watching it for research. In the documentary Page talks to the interviewer about getting her poems accepted by the influential Chicago-based magazine, Poetry. She says that she’d wanted poems in that magazine for years, but once it happened it didn’t seem like a big thing. In the documentary Page then references Groucho Marx, mixing up the phrase somewhat, saying, “Why should I join an exclusive club that lets in people like me?” There was the 1954 Governor General’s Literary Award winner, for everyone to stream for free on the NFB website, laughing at herself, self-deprecating and undermining the selectness of her achievement.

My time at the A-frame can be pretty accurately summed up by that scene in that documentary. There I was, by some measures a “successful writer” who was sitting in the cottage of a Canadian literary icon by the means of a prestigious residency program, selected by a jury of my peers for this honour, and I was still grappling with self-doubt. It’s a funny thing to also view the figures of CanLit’s past, like Page, as humans and not just the geniuses behind their best literary compositions. It’s a little odd, even, to view them as capable of feeling like imposters or frauds or hacks. (Aside: on the topic of poets being self conscious, while I was at the residency I read a bunch of Al’s correspondences published in Yours, Al: The Collected Letters of Al Purdy and my favourite line was from one of Al’s letters to the American poet Charles Bukowski, in a moment when Al was, I guess, getting a bit too emotional or sentimental for his liking and needed to alleviate the seriousness of his tone by saying: “Anyway, talking about feeling as above, bothers me. I’m so fuckin self conscious I doubt the motives for shitting.”) There is a little yellow Moleskine journal in the A-frame where each writer-in-residence can put down a few sentences or paragraphs about their time in the space. That document also clarified for me that everyone who had been in Purdy’s cottage hadn’t just been creating non-stop, penning perfect poem after perfect poem. It did take me getting there to realize that this kind of output wasn’t expected of me over my 4-week residency. When I was first informed that my application to the residency was accepted I was overjoyed, then came the anxiety mixed with excitement, and once I’d arrived I felt simultaneously like I belonged and never should have stepped foot in there. I felt like I shouldn’t’ve joined the club that would have someone like me.

Going back to the beginning, let me review how I got the A-frame residency. As I mentioned, there was an application process. Like most writing residencies, the application consists of a professional curriculum vitae, a plan for the residency (i.e. a project that will be worked on and/or completed at the residency), a writing sample, and an optional letter of reference. The Al & Eurithe Purdy A-frame residency is somewhat unique because the application also includes a “community-based project” that the writer-in-residence will complete during their stay in Prince Edward County, where Al & Eurithe’s A-frame is located. Suggested community projects are writing workshops or public readings; the first writer-in-residence at the A-frame, Katherine Leyton, filmed various strangers around the County reading a poem by Al Purdy for her community-project. This was the source of my initial spat of self-doubt. What could I, a 30-something Ottawa-based writer without a full-length collection and a smattering of poems in nationally-distributed literary magazines, offer to a community around 200 kilometers away from where some writers actually know my name and (perhaps, hopefully) care about what I’m doing? I pitched printing linocut poster poems or broadsides as my project. I’m no artist, but the assessors of my application probably didn’t know that. And I thought it would be unique. If you can’t be ambitious when writing an application for a grant or to a writing residency, when can you? In October 2024 I sent in my application package, six printed copies mailed to BC and an email I finally hit “send” on at 11am on a Friday.

I missed the phone call from Jean Baird, board member of the A-frame Association, when she was trying to notify me that I’d be selected as a writer-in-residence at the Al & Eurithe Purdy A-frame. I was in the shower. What are the chances that she would call during the five minutes I was washing! She sent me an email asking for a good time to connect after I didn’t pick up, which I saw while toweling off, and I called her right back. I might have even still been wearing a towel. The phone call was brief, I think, although it sent me soaring. Whatever was said doesn’t really matter—perhaps some generous comments on my application from Jean, definitely multiple utterances of thanks from me—though I’m sure Jean could hear my grin on the other side of the phone. It was January 2025 and, not that Jean could possible know this, it was just 12 days before my 35th birthday. I would be notified later that I would be the last writer-in-residence for 2025, living in the A-frame for four weeks from mid-October to mid-November. At the beginning of the year, the residency couldn’t come soon enough, although I knew there were still obstacles to navigate.

Here’s what the A-frame writer-in-residence is offered: a stipend of $750 per week, a temporary library card for the library at Queen’s University in Kingston, and the entirety of Al and Eurithe’s A-frame cottage for four weeks. (I believe some residencies were longer in the past, and even in 2025 there is a Steven Heighton Fellowship that includes a six-week residency.) Here’s what the writer-in-residence is still expected to do after being offered a residency: submit a grant proposal to the Canada Council for the Arts (CCA) for matched funding for the residency and travel expenses. Writing a grant application is and isn’t an onerous task. It’s not much more work than the residency application, but cultural funding agencies require a budget detailing what every penny of funding will be spent on. Everyone I talked to, including the folks at the A-frame Association, insisted that I should ask for the full amount possible from the CCA. Everyone I talked to assured me that, even if I didn’t receive what I’d asked for, the CCA would offer the travel funding for the residency, considering this was an exclusive opportunity offered through a juried application process. Most of my time working on that grant application I spent finetuning my budget, concerned that this would be the thing that would make or break my application, but I’ll likely never know if that was the deciding factor.

Of course I wasn’t offered anything by the CCA. Nada. Zilch. “It did not score highly enough compared to others” is the extent of the explanation in the results email. I would learn this result of my grant application just about a month before I was to head to the A-frame. When I first opened the email with the results of my application, I thought for a moment, “This is another jury of my peers telling me that I don’t actually deserve this residency, that my writing isn’t worthy of even a miniscule investment of a couple thousand dollars to help make this opportunity possible.”  With only the $3000 stipend from the A-frame Association and an expectation to take the 4-week residency off from my various jobs, I had to pivot last minute to ensure that I didn’t have to pay out of pocket for a month-long car rental, and that I wouldn’t have to resort to subsiding on white rice at the A-frame. Luckily, my parents have two cars and the ability to spare one for four weeks. That did mean, however, that the first day of my residency was going to consist of approximately 8 hours of travel: getting my uncle to drive me from Ottawa to Barrie, getting my parents’ car there, then driving from Barrie to Ameliasburgh. When I first stepped into that cottage at around 8PM on a rainy Sunday in October, I knew the whole ordeal was worth it.

The space that Al Purdy lived and worked in for almost 50 years, where he wrote the Governor General's Award-winning The Cariboo Horses and many other books, where numerous other CanLit icons visited and drank and wrote and laughed—it’s a magical space. I wrote a poem that first night that I got there—three poems, actually, although there at least two of them will remain pages in a notebook and nothing more—and I set a goal for myself to write at least one poem every day during my residency. I set a number of goals or rules for myself: reading for at least one hour every morning, exercising at least once a day, baking something once a week. I didn’t achieve that last goal, and the only thing I “baked” myself was pancakes for breakfast. The rules were essentially effective, though, and paired with the newness of the cottage and the break from my usual day-to-day responsibilities (apart from cooking and doing dishes) I found myself quite productive, especially in those first few days. It was a novelty to wake up and have nothing to do except read and write and think about poetry. Nevertheless, after the first week I began to question my work, both the new poems I was writing at the A-frame and more generally. I reached out to my group chat to kvetch about not feeling successful. The first week at the A-frame was novel but it eventually sunk in that bar was set incredibly high, that people who had written and created art in this space were successful and talented and the same expectation would be held up against my work now. I started to question the intentions behind my writing, whether they were justifiable or if they even existed at all. I was reminded by my lovely and patient friends that the only person who is setting the bar for myself is myself. The morning after I sought reassurances from my group chat I wrote a sort of Ars Poetica that was really a series of questions to myself and no one in particular, a two-page anxiety-induced rant about how I feared that my poetry didn’t matter, and an uncertain guide to how I could make my poetry somewhat matter to a certain audience or even a wider audience, if I could pull it off.

It’s still too soon after leaving the A-frame to know if my newfound purpose is actually leading to any sort of meaningful change in my writing. It’s too soon to know if any of the writing I did at the A-frame is any good. (I haven’t really looked at any of it since I left.) I am certain, though, that I’ll never not feel self conscious in the literary world, like I’m taking up space that would be better filled by someone else. But, like P.K. Page and Al Purdy and a million other writers seem to always be advocating this, the goal is to stick to it and to keep working on the craft and to fake confidence if necessary. Nobody wants to read a self conscious poet, but goddammit that’s what they’re gonna get if they ever pick up my book.

 

 

 

 

Chris Johnson (he/him) was born in Scarborough, Ontario, and currently lives on unceded, unsurrendered territory of the Anishinaabe Algonquin Nation (Ottawa). He is the managing editor for Arc Poetry Magazine and editorial assistant at Nightwood Editions. In Fall 2025, Chris was a writer-in-residence at the Al & Eurithe Purdy A-frame. His latest chapbook is 320 lines of poetry (counting blank lines) (Anstruther Press, 2023).

Daniel Barbiero : Contemporary Tangential Surrealist Poetry: An Anthology, edited by Tony Kitt

Contemporary Tangential Surrealist Poetry: An Anthology, ed. Tony Kitt
SurVision Books, 2023

 

 

 

 

Of all the pioneering avant-garde movements of the last century, Surrealism inarguably was the most successful in terms of its reach and lasting influence. Long after Cubism, Futurism, and Dadaism have been relegated to museums, Surrealist groups continue to be active in the United States, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, the UK, France, Spain, Portugal, and likely elsewhere as well. Beyond these groups, which are dedicated to carrying out the original Surrealist program as defined by movement founder and chief theoretician André Breton, many others—individuals working in various art or art-related fields—have found in Surrealism a source of ideas, methods, and concerns to be adopted and adapted, more or less loosely, to their own ends. Contemporary Tangential Surrealist Poetry, an anthology of recent Surrealist-inspired poetry largely from the Anglosphere, shows just how fecund and adaptable Surrealism has been and continues to be as model and inspiration for the poetic manifestation of language.

As poet and editor Tony Kitt notes in his introduction, the designation “Tangential Surrealism” derives from art historian Dickran Tashjian’s description of a wartime American avant-garde pursuing “goals that were sometimes derived from, sometimes at odds with, sometimes tangential to” orthodox Surrealism. By the same token, the forty-two poets from nine countries included in Kitt’s multigenerational anthology connect with classic Surrealism in a variety of ways, sometimes closely and sometimes more tangentially. It isn’t a movement so much as a tendency uniting disparate writers who share a general relationship to language. Each pursues expressive ends of his or her own. Some, but by no means all, seem to be explicitly motivated by the pursuit of classical Surrealism’s main goals—the revelation of the workings of the mind, the pursuit of the marvelous, the reconciliation of the dream and wakeful life. And yet just by writing as they do, these poets often do achieve these ends almost as a matter of course. That’s because, as Kitt describes it, Tangential Surrealist poetry is poetry grounded in “wonder, intuition, and surprising connections” embodied in “associative leaps, from word to word, from phrase to phrase, and from image to image.” The kind of associative logic Kitt describes is a core element of any kind of Surrealist writing, which leverages analogical rather than logical thought processes as it cuts a path through language’s dense forest of symbols.

The basic unit of Surrealist poetics, the form its associative logic canonically takes, is the catalytic image: an image made up of spontaneous and logically incongruous verbal associations which provoke thought by revealing hidden affinities between seemingly unrelated phenomena. The idea goes back to Lautreamont’s strange analogies (“beautiful as the chance encounter of an umbrella and sewing machine on a dissecting table”) as well as to Reverdy’s definition of the poetic image as the product of the imagined juxtaposition of two more or less distant realities: the more distant the realities, the truer and more powerful the poetry of the image. Contemporary Tangential Surrealist Poetry is replete with such catalytic imagery.

Here, for example, is the beginning of Angela Cleland’s “Cross,” a poem about a (real? Metaphorical?) sparring match: 

Needling of jabs, riddle of ducks and feints,
you wait a clear target. 

It comes, as brief as a sparkplug’s discharge,
as a flash of knicker.

The irregular movements of the boxer’s bobbing and weaving becomes a “riddle”; the fight itself is a “needling.” The analogy in the second stanza brings together phenomena from two ontologically distant realms—a sparkplug’s firing and a fleeting view of an undergarment are two very different things—but they’re linked analogically by the shared property of momentariness. Similarly, Helen Ivory’s “The Square of the Clockmaker,” a short poem featuring de Chiricoesque images of trains, squares, and clocks, plays an arresting game of one-into-the-other when it sets up an analogy between a train track running into a tunnel and a tongue rolling up into a mouth. Kitt himself brings together distant realities in his “A Collage Has a Thousand Mouths” by analogizing politicians to cathedrals and creating strange compounds like “matchstick horseracing,” “headwings,” “caterpillar dog,” and “spider flowers.”

Critic Robert Baker characterized Surrealist writing as embodying an aesthetic of the extravagant—a wandering beyond the limits of everyday experience. It’s also extravagant in the plainer sense of lavish. We see this particularly in Will Alexander’s “Texas Blind Salamander Feelings,” a virtuoso poem that transmutes the sightless, cave-dwelling amphibian into a marvelous creature whose essence is defined by what it lacks:

Its sonar glowing
its eyes
inverted aphid’s scrolls
having taken on the tenor of nautical-turpentine sparks
creeping reptilian polyps
being sulphur as in-lunation
not unlike flameless snow fields re-inverting
being the dialectical polarity
of magma
being molten underground intarsias
their movement
not unlike the wind from a primitive whispering axe

That was just the first stanza. Over the course of the poem Alexander works an elaborate transvaluation in which the salamander’s sightlessness becomes an asset, a “sight/not unlike prophecy,” making it a kind of non-human Tiresias in the underworld.

The oracular implications of Alexander’s poem bring to mind Surrealist interest in myth and archetype, as realized in ideas and images drawn from what poet Clayton Eshelman called “the floor of human imagination.” This strand of Surrealist or Surrealist-inspired writing was particularly strong in American poetry of the 1960s and 1970s; it’s represented in the anthology by Jerome Rothenberg, whose “To Dream Infinity” alludes to cosmogenesis and “the far look/ of an ancient/ god/ his hands/ ready to bring us/ down.”

Stefania Heim’s “From Hour Book: 6:35 PM” seems to reach back to Surrealism’s original efforts to manifest the unfettered workings of the mind through writing-let-off-the-leash: 

Slide projector rain in the space
of sought solitude. Wishing
for leaf shadows that are ever-more 

distinct. I came at the appointed
time, but that time was in error...

From a few fragmentary images there emerges the recollection of a mundane event—showing up at the wrong time—that may have been floating on the surface of the speaker’s mind at the time of writing. That time is memorialized in the poem’s title, which names a discrete moment in time, implying that the text that follows is a record of the unfolding of verbal consciousness in and from that moment. By putting the non-logical associations of her imagery in the context of a given moment, Heim shows how, as moments of time coalesce into words and phrases, time’s sequentiality is put under a microscope that reveals the fissures and cracks that run through its ostensibly smooth and uniform flow. Time-as-thought-as-stream of verbal imagery is lumpy in a way that the everyday, unreflective experience of time generally isn’t.

Charles Borkhuis, writing with a plainer diction than most, subverts both the form and conventional wisdom of the cliché as he brings his own critical eye to everyday experience. His poetry, which engages the limitations and inadequacies of the existential reality we’re all condemned to inhabit, embodies the kind of dark humor that was an important element of Surrealism in its early years. “Further Instructions” advises us that there’s 

no need to panic
most ideas only go so far
then someone blows a whistle
and you pick yourself up off the ground
maybe we’re not made to get
to the heart of the matter
maybe nothing sticks around that long

This disillusioned, or better, unillusioned, acknowledgment of where things stand with us—that we’re hampered by our incomplete knowledge and the inevitable failures that follow from it--is in its own way an assertion of a strange kind of pleasure over the reality that would run us into the ground.

These are only a few samples of what’s in Contemporary Tangential Surrealist Poetry; there is much more. George Kalamaras’ vivid imagery creates hallucinatory scenarios in which the imagination is freed from mundane constraints; Andrew Joron and Andrew Zawacki put stress on disrupting language at the structural levels of grammar and syntax in order to take Surrealism’s verbal liberties one radical step beyond; Michael Leong’s intertextual “Disorientations” uses Surrealist collage to explore issues of identity and authenticity; Alison Dunhill’s “Cloud Construction” situates itself within the tradition of the Surrealist prose poem. The one non-Anglophone poet represented here is the Ukrainian Julia Stakhivska, whose work is translated by Anatoly Kudryavitsky.

But this only gives a hint of the imaginative provocations to be had in Kitt’s anthology. It leaves little doubt that just a little over one hundred years after its founding, Surrealism and its poetic offshoots continue to thrive and inspire.

 

 

 

 

Daniel Barbiero is a writer, double bassist, and composer in the Washington DC area. He writes about the art, music, and literature of the classic avant-gardes of the 20th century as well as on contemporary work; his essays and reviews have appeared in Arteidolia, The Amsterdam Review, Heavy Feather Review, periodicities, Rain Taxi, Word for/Word, Otoliths, Offcourse, Open Doors Review, London Grip, Perfect Sound Forever, Point of Departure, and elsewhere. His essays on poetics have appeared in the books Telling It Slant (University of Alabama Press), and The World in Time and Space (Talisman House); he is the author of As Within, So Without, a collection of essays published by Arteidolia Press. His score Boundary Conditions III appears in A Year of Deep Listening (Terra Nova Press). Website: https://danielbarbiero.wordpress.com.

most popular posts